ACTIVIST PLAYBOOK

Minnesota Action Guide

Fighting Encryption in the North Star State

After George Floyd's murder, Minneapolis encrypted police radios at the worst possible moment. Now, when accountability matters most, the public is locked out. Minnesota has strong transparency laws and a proven activist community. This guide shows you how to restore public access and rebuild trust through transparency.

Minnesota Encryption Landscape

From open communications to locked doors

Minneapolis

Fully Encrypted (Post-2020)

Minneapolis Police encrypted radios after the George Floyd protests, citing officer safety. This eliminated real-time public oversight during a period demanding maximum transparency.

St. Paul

Partial Encryption

St. Paul maintains some accessible dispatch channels but has moved toward encryption on tactical frequencies. The trend is concerning.

Hennepin County

Shared System with MPD

Hennepin County Sheriff and suburban departments share infrastructure with Minneapolis. As Minneapolis encrypted, access across the county diminished.

Greater Minnesota

Mostly Open

Many outstate departments maintain open dispatch channels. Rural communities understand the value of public awareness during emergencies.

Suburban Twin Cities

Mixed Policies

Suburbs across Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Anoka, and Washington counties vary widely. Some remain open; others have followed Minneapolis.

The Minneapolis Paradox

Minneapolis encrypted police radios after George Floyd's murder, when public oversight was most critical. The community demanded accountability; the department responded with opacity. This contradiction is your strongest argument for restoring transparency.

George Floyd, Accountability, and Encryption

Why Minneapolis encryption matters nationally

What Happened

On May 25, 2020, Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd. The subsequent protests sparked a national reckoning on police accountability. The Minneapolis Police Department was placed under DOJ investigation, the city faced consent decree negotiations, and reform became the central political issue.

How Minneapolis Responded

Instead of increasing transparency, MPD encrypted police radios. This move eliminated real-time public monitoring of police activity at the exact moment when trust was at its lowest. For a community demanding accountability, encryption sent a clear message: we don't want you watching.

Timeline of Minneapolis Encryption

May 2020 George Floyd murdered; protests begin nationwide
2020-2021 DOJ opens pattern-or-practice investigation into MPD
2021 Minneapolis Police encrypt radio communications
2023 DOJ releases findings; consent decree negotiations begin
Present Public locked out of real-time police oversight during reform implementation

Arguments for Restoring Minneapolis Transparency

  • Consent decree compliance: How can the public verify police are following court-ordered reforms without real-time monitoring?
  • Trust rebuilding: Encryption signals the department has something to hide, undermining reconciliation efforts
  • Community safety: Residents in areas with high police activity deserve real-time awareness
  • Journalist oversight: Media cannot independently verify police accounts of incidents
  • National symbolism: Minneapolis became a symbol of police accountability; encryption contradicts that narrative

Minnesota Data Practices Act

Your legal tools for fighting encryption

Minnesota Government Data Practices Act

Minn. Stat. Ch. 13

Minnesota's data practices law is among the strongest in the nation. It presumes all government data is public unless specifically classified as private or nonpublic. Use it aggressively.

  • Response deadline: "Immediately, if possible, or within a reasonable time"
  • No fees for inspection: Looking at records is free; copying fees limited
  • Appeal to: Commissioner of Administration or district court
  • Civil penalties: Officials can be personally liable for willful violations
Get Minnesota FOIA templates

Minnesota Open Meeting Law

Minn. Stat. Ch. 13D

Government bodies must conduct business openly. If the decision to encrypt was made in closed session without proper justification, it may be voidable.

  • 3-day notice required for regular meetings
  • Closed sessions limited: Must cite specific statutory authority
  • Votes must be public: All votes on encryption policy should be recorded
  • Minutes required: Including for closed portions

Key tactic: Request minutes and recordings of all meetings where encryption was discussed. If decisions were made improperly, challenge them.

Sample Minnesota Data Practices Request

To: [Agency] Data Practices Compliance Official

Subject: Minnesota Government Data Practices Act Request - Police Radio Encryption

Pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13), I request access to the following government data:

  1. All documented incidents from January 1, 2019 to present where public access to police radio communications (via scanner, streaming, or similar means) resulted in injury to any officer, escape of a suspect, or compromise of any police operation in [Jurisdiction].
  2. All budget documents, vendor contracts, and cost estimates related to police radio encryption systems, including P25 system upgrades.
  3. All internal correspondence (emails, memos, meeting minutes) regarding the decision to encrypt police radio communications.
  4. Any policies or procedures regarding media or public access to police communications, before and after encryption.
  5. Data on response times and public notification procedures for emergencies before and after encryption implementation.

If no responsive data exists for any category, please confirm in writing pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13.03.

I request inspection of these records and electronic copies where available. Please contact me to arrange inspection within a reasonable time.

If any data is classified as not public, please cite the specific statutory classification under Chapter 13 and provide a written explanation.

Enforcement Options

If your data request is denied or inadequately answered:

Commissioner of Administration

Can provide advisory opinions on data classifications. Not binding but influential.

Website: mn.gov/admin/data-practices

District Court Action

You can sue directly in district court. Prevailing parties may recover attorney fees. Consider partnering with press freedom organizations.

Information Policy Analysis Division

Phone: (651) 296-6733

Email: ipad@state.mn.us

Key Minnesota Contacts

Who to call, write, and visit

Minnesota Legislature

State legislation could establish transparency requirements statewide. Minnesota's legislature has passed significant police reform bills since 2020.

Find Your State Representative

Minnesota House of Representatives

Website: house.mn.gov

Phone: (651) 296-2146

Use the "Find My Representative" tool on the website.

Find Your State Senator

Minnesota Senate

Website: senate.mn

Phone: (651) 296-0504

Senators serve 4-year terms and may be more insulated from pressure.

Key Committees

  • House Public Safety Finance and Policy - Jurisdiction over law enforcement policy and funding
  • Senate Judiciary and Public Safety - Police accountability and criminal justice
  • House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law - Civil rights and transparency issues

Minneapolis City Government

Minneapolis operates under a weak-mayor system. The City Council has significant policy authority, including over police oversight.

START HERE

Find Your City Council Member

Minneapolis City Council (13 Wards)

Website: minneapolismn.gov/government/city-council

Council members are your most direct path to policy change. Find yours by ward.

Mayor's Office

Office of Mayor Jacob Frey

Phone: (612) 673-2100

Website: minneapolismn.gov/government/mayor

The mayor appoints the police chief but has limited direct authority.

Office of Police Conduct Review (OPCR)

Civilian police oversight body

Phone: (612) 673-5500

Website: minneapolismn.gov/government/departments/opcr

OPCR needs real-time information to effectively review police conduct.

Minneapolis Police Chief

Minneapolis Police Department

Phone: (612) 673-3000

The chief implemented encryption. Document their justifications for appeals to council.

Hennepin County Government

Hennepin County includes Minneapolis and 44 suburban cities. The County Board controls the Sheriff's Office and regional communications infrastructure.

Hennepin County Board of Commissioners

7 commissioners representing county districts

Website: hennepin.us/board

Phone: (612) 348-3000

Find your commissioner by district. They control county radio system funding.

Hennepin County Sheriff

Sheriff's Office

Website: hennepin.us/sheriff

The Sheriff is an elected official. Direct pressure can influence policy.

St. Paul City Government

St. Paul maintains more accessible communications than Minneapolis. Protect this status and advocate for it as a regional model.

St. Paul City Council

7 Council Members by Ward

Website: stpaul.gov/council

Thank St. Paul for maintaining partial access. Encourage them to resist full encryption.

Ramsey County Board of Commissioners

7 commissioners

Website: ramseycounty.us/county-board

Ramsey County controls regional infrastructure used by St. Paul and suburbs.

Twin Cities Advocacy Strategies

Tactics for Minneapolis, St. Paul, and surrounding communities

Minneapolis: Restoration Campaign

Goal: Restore public access to MPD radio communications

Key Arguments

  • Consent decree context: Public needs real-time oversight to verify reform compliance
  • Trust deficit: Encryption deepens distrust between MPD and the community
  • George Floyd legacy: Transparency was a core demand; encryption contradicts it
  • Emergency access: Minneapolis residents deserve real-time safety information

Priority Targets

  • City Council members from wards most affected by police activity
  • Council members who supported police reform measures
  • Community organizations already engaged on police accountability

St. Paul: Protection Campaign

Goal: Prevent St. Paul from following Minneapolis into full encryption

Key Arguments

  • Differentiation: St. Paul can model transparency where Minneapolis failed
  • Community trust: Open communications support SPPD's community policing approach
  • Regional coordination: Interoperability with fire/EMS requires accessible channels

Priority Targets

  • Council members and the mayor
  • St. Paul Police Federation (may have different views than MPD union)
  • Community councils in each district

Suburban Twin Cities: Prevention Focus

Many suburban departments haven't encrypted yet. Act now to ensure they don't.

Dakota County

Eagan, Burnsville, Lakeville, Apple Valley

Contact city councils before system upgrades trigger encryption discussions

Anoka County

Blaine, Coon Rapids, Fridley, Anoka

Engage county commissioners on regional radio system policies

Washington County

Woodbury, Stillwater, Cottage Grove

Fast-growing suburbs often make encryption decisions during infrastructure upgrades

Scott & Carver Counties

Shakopee, Prior Lake, Chaska, Chanhassen

Southwestern suburbs maintain strong community connections; leverage them

Building Your Coalition

Police Accountability Groups

Minnesota has an active police accountability community forged after George Floyd. These groups understand why encryption is a transparency issue.

  • Communities United Against Police Brutality
  • ACLU of Minnesota
  • Legal Rights Center

Neighborhood Organizations

Minneapolis has 70+ registered neighborhood organizations. St. Paul has district councils. These groups care about local safety information.

Fire & EMS Allies

Fire departments and EMS have interoperability concerns. They may support keeping channels accessible for coordination.

Minnesota Media Contacts & Allies

Build your coalition

Media Organizations

KEY ALLY

Minnesota News Media Association

Represents newspapers, broadcasters, and digital media across Minnesota. They've advocated for open government and press access.

Website: mna.org

Ask MNNA to issue statement supporting scanner access and press freedom.

Minnesota Broadcasters Association

Represents TV and radio stations statewide. Breaking news coverage depends on scanner access.

Website: minnesotabroadcasters.com

Contact MBA to coordinate advocacy among member stations.

Twin Cities News Directors

WCCO, KSTP, KARE 11, Fox 9, and MPR all have covered police accountability extensively since George Floyd.

Pitch story: "Minneapolis encrypted police radios after George Floyd. Here's why that matters."

Civil Liberties & Advocacy

ACLU of Minnesota

Has been central to police accountability work since George Floyd. May provide legal guidance or coalition support.

Website: aclu-mn.org

Contact their policing program about encryption as a transparency issue.

Minnesota Coalition on Government Information

Statewide coalition focused on open government. Expert on Data Practices Act enforcement.

Website: mncogi.org

Partner on data requests and legislative advocacy.

Minnesota Freedom of Information Coalition

Press freedom advocacy group with expertise in Minnesota transparency law.

Request guidance on challenging encryption decisions under Data Practices Act.

Community & Accountability Organizations

Communities United Against Police Brutality

Long-standing Minneapolis organization focused on police accountability. Natural ally on transparency.

Website: cuapb.org

Legal Rights Center

Provides legal representation and advocacy on criminal justice issues in Minneapolis.

Website: legalrightscenter.org

Minneapolis NAACP

Has been active on police reform issues. Frame encryption as civil rights concern.

Take Action in Minnesota

Everything you need to fight encryption

Minnesota Can Lead on Accountability

After George Floyd, the world watched Minnesota. Encryption was the wrong response to demands for transparency. But Minnesota's activist community, strong transparency laws, and national attention give you the tools to reverse course. When Minneapolis restores scanner access, it will send a message nationwide that accountability matters more than secrecy.

Take Action for Transparency

Your voice matters. Here are concrete ways to advocate for open police communications in your community.

๐Ÿ“ง

Contact Your Representatives

Use our templates to email your local officials about police radio encryption policies.

Get Started
๐Ÿ“š

Read Case Studies

See how encryption has affected real communities - from Highland Park to Chicago.

View Cases
๐Ÿ“ข

Spread Awareness

Share evidence about police radio encryption with your network and community.

๐Ÿ“Š

See the Evidence

Review the facts, myths, and research on police radio encryption.

View Evidence
๐ŸŽค

Public Testimony

Learn how to speak effectively at city council and public safety meetings.

Prepare to Speak
๐Ÿ“ฅ

Download Resources

Get FOIA templates, talking points, and materials for advocacy.

Access Toolkit