Baltimore's 15-Minute Delay: A Compromise That Satisfies No One
When the Baltimore Police Department encrypted its radio communications in 2023, it offered what appeared to be a middle ground: the public could still access scanner audio, but with a 15-minute delay. This compromise sounds reasonable—but in practice, it undermines the core purposes of scanner access while providing cover for de facto encryption.
Key Facts at a Glance
How the 15-Minute Delay Works
Baltimore's system creates a technical barrier between live police communications and public access:
- Live communications encrypted: Real-time radio traffic is inaccessible to the public
- 15-minute buffer: Audio is released after a quarter-hour delay
- Review possible: Department can still filter or remove content before release
- No tactical channels: Only dispatch channels are included in delayed release
Why 15 Minutes Is Still Too Long
Police departments promote delayed access as a "reasonable compromise." But in practice, even a 15-minute delay eliminates most of the benefits of scanner access:
Breaking News Coverage
A 15-minute delay means journalists arrive at scenes after they've often concluded. The first 15 minutes of any incident are typically the most newsworthy—and now invisible.
Active Threat Awareness
During an active shooter, hostage situation, or dangerous pursuit, 15 minutes is the difference between warning the public and providing a historical record. By minute 15, people are already dead, injured, or safe.
Accountability Documentation
Initial police responses often differ from later official accounts. A 15-minute delay gives departments time to coordinate messaging before the public hears original communications.
Community Coordination
Neighbors warning each other about nearby incidents—a traditional scanner use—becomes impossible when information arrives after the danger has passed.
Comparison: Delay Models Across Cities
Baltimore's 15-minute delay is shorter than Chicago's 30-minute model, but both fundamentally break the value proposition of scanner access:
| City | Delay | Breaking News | Active Threats | Accountability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Access | 0 minutes | Full coverage | Real-time warnings | Unfiltered record |
| Baltimore | 15 minutes | Severely limited | Too late | Coordination possible |
| Chicago | 30 minutes | Useless | Too late | Full narrative control |
| Full Encryption | Infinite | None | None | None |
The Key Insight
Whether it's 15 minutes or 30 minutes, delayed access is not real access. It provides the appearance of transparency while eliminating the functional benefits of scanner monitoring. Departments can claim they "still provide access" while making that access meaningless for its core purposes.
The Highland Park Comparison
During the July 4, 2022 mass shooting in Highland Park, Illinois, open scanner access allowed:
- Residents to know which streets were unsafe in real time
- Family members to locate loved ones
- People to understand the evolving situation as it happened
What if Highland Park had a 15-minute delay?
The shooting lasted approximately 10 minutes. Under Baltimore's model, the public would have received zero useful information during the actual event. Every life-saving decision based on scanner information would have been impossible.
Read the Highland Park case studyWhy Departments Prefer Delayed Access
From a police department perspective, delayed access is the ideal compromise:
Provides Political Cover
"We still provide access" deflects criticism from transparency advocates, even though the access is functionally useless for most purposes.
Enables Narrative Control
Fifteen minutes is enough time to coordinate messaging, prepare press releases, and establish the official story before scanner audio reveals initial communications.
Eliminates Real-Time Oversight
No one can hear police responses as they happen. If something goes wrong, there are no independent witnesses monitoring in real time.
Appears Reasonable
"Only 15 minutes" sounds modest to people who don't understand how scanner access actually works or why real-time matters.
Fighting Delayed Access Proposals
If your community is considering a delayed access "compromise," here's how to respond:
Reject the Premise
Delayed access is not real access. Don't let departments frame it as a reasonable middle ground—it eliminates the core benefits of scanner monitoring.
Cite Highland Park
Real-world examples show that real-time access saves lives. Delay would have made Highland Park's scanner community coordination impossible.
Ask: "What Threat?"
Demand documented evidence that scanner access has ever caused harm. Without evidence, there's no justification for any delay.
Propose Real Alternatives
The CHP Model protects privacy without delay. Hybrid systems can address legitimate concerns while maintaining real-time access.
Sources
Take Action for Transparency
Your voice matters. Here are concrete ways to advocate for open police communications in your community.
Contact Your Representatives
Use our templates to email your local officials about police radio encryption policies.
Get StartedRead Case Studies
See how encryption has affected real communities - from Highland Park to Chicago.
View CasesSpread Awareness
Share evidence about police radio encryption with your network and community.
Public Testimony
Learn how to speak effectively at city council and public safety meetings.
Prepare to Speak