Talking Points

Police Radio Encryption
1
No evidence supports the "officer safety" claim

Zero documented cases of scanner-related officer harm in 100+ years of open radio.

2
Encryption costs millions with no proven benefit

NYPD: $390M. Philadelphia: $80M. No ROI for public safety.

3
Alternatives exist

Tactical-only encryption, delayed feeds, and hybrid models address concerns without full opacity.

4
Fire/EMS leaders oppose it

Interoperability concerns affect emergency response coordination.

5
Highland Park proves scanners save lives

2022 parade shooting: open scanners enabled faster public warning.

Counter-Arguments

Responding to Claims
"Officers' safety is at risk"
→ Ask for documented incidents. There are none. The risk is theoretical.
"Criminals use scanners to evade police"
→ Modern criminals use cell phones, not scanners. This claim is outdated.
"We provide press releases instead"
→ Press releases are curated narratives, not real-time information. They omit details.
"Media can apply for access"
→ Credential programs exclude freelancers, create gatekeeping, and delay access.
"Other cities have done it"
→ Some cities have reversed encryption after community pushback (Palo Alto, Boulder).

How to Use This Card

  1. Print on cardstock if possible for durability
  2. Cut along the dotted lines
  3. Fold in half or keep both sides visible
  4. Bring to city council meetings and public comment sessions
  5. Review key points before speaking
  6. Reference counter-arguments when responding to officials