This page is optimized for printing. Use Ctrl/Cmd + P to save as PDF or print directly.
Fighting Police Radio Encryption
A journalist's guide to advocating for scanner access
The Issue at a Glance
Police departments across America are encrypting their radio communications, cutting off a century-old tool that journalists have used to cover breaking news, monitor police conduct, and inform the public. This encryption surge accelerated after 2020 protests, with many departments citing officer safety despite no documented evidence of scanner-related harm.
Why This Matters to Journalists
Delayed Breaking News
Without scanners, journalists rely on official press releases, often 30-60 minutes after incidents begin. During the Highland Park parade shooting, scanner-equipped journalists broke the story 20+ minutes before encrypted-area outlets.
Lost Accountability
Scanners let journalists hear unfiltered police communications, catching discrepancies between official narratives and real-time events. Encryption eliminates this independent verification.
Public Information Void
Many community members rely on scanner feeds for emergency awareness. Encryption creates information deserts that affect vulnerable populations most.
First Amendment Concerns
While no court has ruled scanners are a constitutional right, the systematic exclusion of press from public safety information raises serious press freedom concerns.
Key Talking Points
In 100+ years of open police radio, there are zero documented cases where scanner access led to officer harm. The claim is theoretical, not evidence-based.
Departments spend $500,000 to $50+ million on encryption infrastructure with no demonstrated return on investment for public safety.
Tactical channels for sensitive operations, delayed feeds, and redaction protocols can protect specific needs without blanket encryption.
Emergency services leaders have testified against police encryption due to interoperability concerns and delayed situational awareness.
The encryption surge began immediately after 2020 protests when police conduct was under unprecedented public scrutiny.
Responding to Counter-Arguments
FOIA Request Template
Use this template to request records about encryption decisions. Customize the bracketed sections for your state's public records law.
Subject: Public Records Request - Police Radio Encryption
Pursuant to [STATE PUBLIC RECORDS LAW], I request the following records related to [DEPARTMENT NAME]'s radio communication encryption:
- Any internal memos, reports, or communications discussing the decision to encrypt police radio communications
- Cost analyses, budget documents, or vendor quotes related to encryption equipment and implementation
- Any documented incidents where scanner access contributed to officer safety concerns
- Policies or procedures regarding media access to radio communications
- Any public comments or testimony received regarding the encryption decision
- Communications with other agencies or organizations (SPP, APCO, etc.) regarding encryption best practices
I request electronic copies where available. If any records are withheld, please cite the specific exemption and provide a Vaughn index.
Please respond within [STATUTORY TIMEFRAME] as required by [STATE LAW].
Your Action Steps
Request encryption decision documents, costs, and any evidence supporting the decision.
Speak during public comment on any encryption-related agenda items. Bring fellow journalists.
State press associations can coordinate media coalition responses and legal challenges.
Keep records of stories delayed, missed, or compromised by encryption. Build the evidence base.
Use your platform to educate the public about what they're losing with encrypted police radio.
Delayed feeds, media credentialing, or tactical-only encryption may be acceptable middle grounds.