Fire Department Tactical Only

Yuma City Fire

Yuma, Arizona

What you can do right now

Encryption Details

Encryption Type P25 ADP
Scope Some TAC and dispatch operations
Technical Details P25 ADP

Verified Talkgroup Data

Verified Mar 6, 2026 Moderate confidence
33 Total Talkgroups
15 Encrypted
2 Mixed
16 Unencrypted
49% Encrypted
Radio System: Fisher Wireless TeamTalk, US Marine Corps Installations West (MCI-West), Arizona Wireless Integrated Network System (AZ WINS)
View 17 talkgroups
DEC Alpha Tag Description Status
132 Yuma FD Disp Yuma City Fire Dispatch Encrypted
108 Yuma PD TAC 108 Yuma City Police TAC 108 Encrypted
109 Yuma PD TAC 109 Yuma City Police TAC 109 Encrypted
133 Yuma FD TAC 133 Yuma City Fire TAC 133 Encrypted
134 Yuma FD TAC 134 Yuma City Fire TAC 134 Encrypted
135 Yuma FD TAC 135 Yuma City Fire TAC 135 Encrypted
202 YCSO TAC 202 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 202 Encrypted
207 YCSO TAC 207 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 207 Encrypted
208 YCSO TAC 208 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 208 Encrypted
210 YCSO TAC 210 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 210 Encrypted
212 YCSO TAC 212 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 212 Encrypted
213 YCSO TAC 213 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 213 Encrypted
214 YCSO TAC 214 Yuma County Sheriff TAC 214 Encrypted
106 Yuma PD Yuma City Police Dispatch Mixed
205 YCSO Dispatch Yuma County Sheriff Dispatch Mixed
100 Yuma PD TAC 100 Yuma City Police TAC 100 Encrypted
102 Yuma PD TAC 102 Yuma City Police TAC 102 Encrypted

Verification Status

We don't yet have per-talkgroup data for Yuma City Fire from the RadioReference API. The encryption scope and type above come from the RadioReference Wiki, which is community-maintained rather than independently confirmed channel-by-channel. Our automated matching put this at moderate confidence (70%) based on how closely the wiki listing matches this agency's name and county.

If you monitor Yuma City Fire directly or have more current information, the fastest way to fix this is to update the RadioReference Wiki entry — our data pulls from there and from the RadioReference API on a regular refresh cycle.

Yuma County Context

Yuma City Fire isn't an outlier here: 6 of the 7 public-safety agencies we track in Yuma County are fully encrypted (86%), so most departments nearby have made the same move.

What This Means

Our records list only the tactical side as encrypted here, with routine dispatch possibly in the clear. Verify against the live RadioReference database.

See encryption status nationwide Interactive map showing which US police departments have encrypted their radios. Open the encryption map →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma City Fire radio encrypted?

Our database lists Yuma City Fire as using P25 ADP encryption, though this listing is unverified. Our records list only the tactical side as encrypted here, with routine dispatch possibly in the clear. Verify against the live RadioReference database.

Can I listen to Yuma City Fire on a police scanner?

Possibly. Our database lists Yuma City Fire as encrypting its tactical channels, which would leave some channels accessible. The listing is unverified — check RadioReference for specific talkgroup status.

Why do agencies like Yuma City Fire encrypt their radio?

The standard justification nationwide is officer safety and operational security, regardless of whether a documented local incident ever required it. The tradeoff that follows is consistent too: public oversight drops, and reporters lose the ability to track fire department response as it happens.

Can Yuma County reverse the encryption decision?

Yes — nothing about the underlying radio technology forces this. It's a decision Yuma County officials made and can revisit, and other communities have pushed departments back toward open channels through sustained council pressure and coalition-building.

What can I do about Yuma City Fire encryption?

Three things carry weight, in this order: a public-records request for Yuma City Fire's encryption policy and radio recordings, a turn at the microphone during Yuma County budget discussions, and finding the other people locally already asking the same question. Individually these are easy to deflect; together they are not.

Advertisement