The Timeline Tells a Story

If scanner access genuinely endangered officers, we would expect to see a steady push for encryption throughout police radio history. Instead, we see 70+ years of unconcerned openness, followed by a dramatic acceleration precisely when public scrutiny of policing intensified.

The timeline below makes one thing clear: the encryption push isn't about officer safety. It's about accountability evasion, and the timing proves it.

The Complete Timeline

1921

First Police Radio System

Detroit Police Department installs first one-way police radio system. Officers can receive dispatches but not respond.

Milestone Technology
1933

Two-Way Police Radio Emerges

Bayonne, NJ implements first two-way police radio system. Officers can now communicate in both directions—and so can anyone with a receiver.

Milestone Technology
1940s-1950s

Police Scanners Go Mainstream

Post-war electronics boom makes radio receivers affordable. Citizens begin monitoring police frequencies as a hobby. No serious concerns about public access emerge.

Development Technology
1960s

The Golden Age of Scanners

Portable transistor scanners become widely available. Police departments across America operate openly, with communities monitoring for safety and information.

Development Technology
1986

Electronic Communications Privacy Act

Federal law establishes legal framework for electronic communications but explicitly permits monitoring of unencrypted radio transmissions.

Milestone Policy
1992

LA Riots: Scanner Coverage

During the Los Angeles riots, scanner monitoring provides crucial real-time information to journalists and residents. Open radio access enables extensive coverage of police response.

Milestone Incident
1990s

Digital Radio Transition Begins

Departments begin transitioning from analog to digital systems. Encryption becomes technically feasible but is rarely implemented.

Development Technology
1999

Columbine School Shooting

During the Columbine tragedy, scanner access enables real-time news coverage and helps families locate information. No calls for encryption follow despite the high-profile incident.

Milestone Incident
2001

Post-9/11 Security Concerns

September 11 attacks prompt security reviews. Some agencies cite terrorism concerns for encryption, but widespread adoption does not follow.

Milestone Incident
2005

Hurricane Katrina

Scanner monitoring proves critical during Katrina disaster response. Open communications enable coordination and media coverage of the largest natural disaster response in US history.

Milestone Incident
2006

P25 Standard Adoption

APCO Project 25 digital radio standard gains traction. Includes encryption capability, but many departments implement P25 without activating encryption.

Development Technology
2009

Flight 1549 "Miracle on Hudson"

Scanner audio of Coast Guard and emergency response to the Hudson River plane landing is broadcast worldwide. Open communications enable real-time documentation of the rescue.

Development Incident
2013

Boston Marathon Bombing

Scanner access enables live coverage of the bombing aftermath and manhunt. Millions listen to police communications during the Watertown lockdown. Despite intense scrutiny, no encryption push follows.

Milestone Incident
2014

Eric Garner & Ferguson

High-profile police accountability incidents. NYPD radio remains open, enabling independent documentation. Ferguson protests see extensive scanner monitoring. Accountability movements gain momentum.

Turning Point Incident
2018

California Highway Patrol Encrypts

CHP becomes one of first major statewide agencies to fully encrypt. Sets precedent for California law enforcement.

Turning Point Policy
2019

LAPD Goes Dark

Los Angeles Police Department completes full encryption—largest US city to do so. Decision made with minimal public input. Media protests go unheeded.

Milestone Policy
2020

The Encryption Explosion

Following George Floyd protests and nationwide police scrutiny, encryption proposals accelerate dramatically. Dozens of departments cite "officer safety" while implementing encryption.

Turning Point Policy
2021-2022

Major Cities Fall

Denver, San Jose, San Diego, and other major departments complete encryption. Chicago implements 30-minute delays. Pattern of urban encryption becomes clear.

Development Policy
2022

Highland Park & Uvalde

Highland Park shooting demonstrates scanner access saving lives. Uvalde shows communication failures during crisis. Both events highlight what's lost with encryption.

Turning Point Incident
2024

NYPD Goes Dark

NYPD completes $390 million encryption project, ending 92 years of open radio in America's largest city. Governor Hochul vetoes media access legislation. NYC Council fights back with Int. 1460.

Milestone Policy
2025

The Battleground

Encryption continues expanding nationwide. Resistance movements grow stronger. Palo Alto successfully reverses encryption. State legislatures consider access requirements. The fight for transparency intensifies.

Development Policy

Understanding the Eras

The Open Era (1921-2018)

~97 years

From the first police radio through nearly a century of technological evolution, police communications remained publicly accessible. Departments operated on the assumption that transparency was normal—even beneficial.

  • No pattern of officers harmed by scanner monitoring
  • Citizens routinely monitored for safety information
  • Media covered breaking news in real-time
  • Community policing flourished with open communications

The Transition (2014-2019)

~5 years

Following Ferguson and increased police accountability movements, early adopters began implementing encryption. LAPD's 2019 decision marked a watershed moment for major urban departments.

  • Ferguson protests increase scanner monitoring
  • Body camera debates highlight accountability concerns
  • California Highway Patrol encrypts statewide (2018)
  • LAPD becomes largest encrypted city (2019)

The Encryption Era (2020-Present)

Ongoing

The George Floyd protests and nationwide police scrutiny triggered an explosion of encryption proposals. The timing makes the motivation transparent: departments encrypted precisely when accountability pressure peaked.

  • Dozens of departments announce encryption post-Floyd
  • "Officer safety" cited despite no new evidence
  • Major cities fall in rapid succession
  • Resistance movements begin forming

The Question No One Answers

If scanners endangered officers before 2020, why didn't departments encrypt before 2020?

The encryption argument rests on officer safety. Proponents claim that criminals use scanners to track and harm officers. But this claim has a fatal flaw: timing.

The Technology Existed

Encryption has been technically feasible since the 1990s. Digital radio systems with encryption capability have been available for decades. If encryption were truly necessary for officer safety, departments would have prioritized it long ago.

Nothing Changed About Scanners

Scanners work the same way they did in 1950. The technology hasn't become more dangerous. What changed was public attention to policing—particularly after high-profile incidents captured on video.

The Pattern Is Clear

Encryption proposals spiked after Ferguson (2014), after LAPD controversies (2019), and especially after George Floyd (2020). This pattern correlates with accountability pressure, not with any change in criminal scanner use.

The timeline answers the question departments don't want asked: encryption is about escaping scrutiny, not protecting officers. The post-2020 surge makes this unmistakably clear.

What History Teaches Us

Open Radio Worked

For nearly a century, open police radio supported effective law enforcement. Departments solved crimes, maintained order, and protected communities—all while the public could listen. The claim that encryption is necessary contradicts seven decades of successful open operation.

Transparency Builds Trust

The era of open communications was also an era of generally higher public trust in policing. Communities felt connected to their police through shared awareness. Encryption severs that connection precisely when trust needs rebuilding.

Timing Reveals Motive

The explosion of encryption proposals after 2020 isn't coincidental. Departments that operated openly for decades suddenly found encryption urgent—right when accountability pressure reached historic levels. The timing is the evidence.

The Trend Can Reverse

History also shows that policy decisions can change. Some communities have successfully resisted encryption. Others have implemented alternatives. The encryption trend is not inevitable—if communities push back.

The History Isn't Written Yet

We're living through a historic shift in police transparency. The decisions made now will shape public access for generations. The trend toward encryption isn't inevitable—it's a policy choice that communities can challenge and reverse.

Use the lessons of history to inform the fights of today. Show your community that open communications worked for 70 years, and there's no good reason to end them now.

Learn How to Fight Back